Lava Network and Fireblocks: Blueprint for RPC Resilience

In an era where a few minutes of downtime can erase millions in trading volume, how resilient is your blockchain infrastructure—really?

In 2025, outages at Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cloudflare made one thing brutally clear: if your blockchain strategy still depends on a single cloud or a single RPC provider, you are building mission-critical systems on non-mission-critical foundations. Against this backdrop, the partnership between Lava Network and Fireblocks is less a technology integration and more a blueprint for the next standard in blockchain reliability.

At its core, this collaboration answers a pressing institutional question: how do you guarantee uninterrupted, high‑performance access to blockchain data across 100+ blockchain networks while markets trade 24/7 and regulators expect zero excuses?

From "nodes and endpoints" to "always-on digital rails"

Fireblocks, a leading digital asset platform serving more than 2,000 institutional clients, including banks and trading firms, runs on a simple premise: institutions cannot afford uncertainty when it comes to connectivity. Every trade, every settlement, every wallet inquiry ultimately depends on a single technical layer most executives never see—RPC (Remote Procedure Call) infrastructure.

RPC is the invisible middleware that powers:

• Transaction processing
• Access to wallet histories
• Real-time execution for high-throughput trading and cross-chain trading

In traditional setups, this layer is fragile: a single provider hiccups, and your users feel it as service interruptions, latency spikes, or complete downtime. For institutional clients, that translates directly into lost trading volume, diminished user trust, and operational risk. For organizations seeking to build similar resilient infrastructure, comprehensive security and compliance frameworks provide essential guidance for enterprise-grade system design.

Why Lava Network's Smart Router matters for institutions

To break this dependency, Fireblocks integrated Lava Network's Smart Router, built by Magma Devs, on top of Lava's open-source platform. Instead of routing calls to a single node or vendor, the Smart Router acts as an intelligent, vendor‑agnostic control plane for multi-chain data access:

• It aggregates multiple RPC data providers across chains.
• It automatically routes each request to the fastest and most reliable source.
• It does this without replacing existing infrastructure, so institutions can preserve their current stack while upgrading its resilience.

For over 2,000+ institutional customers operating on 100+ blockchain networks, this means high-availability access becomes an architectural feature, not a best-effort promise.

Under the hood, Smart Router is engineered for performance optimization and fault tolerance:

• Built-in failover systems to seamlessly reroute when a provider fails
• Error recovery so transient issues don't cascade into outages
• Dual caching to accelerate responses and reduce strain on underlying nodes
• Analytics and monitoring tools that give teams observability across providers and networks

The result: Fireblocks can push toward 100% uptime for blockchain data access, redefining expectations for "always-on" infrastructure in institutional digital assets. For sophisticated monitoring and automation of such complex systems, Make.com provides powerful no-code automation platforms that can help teams orchestrate failover processes and monitor system health across multiple providers.

Shifting the operating model: from firefighting nodes to designing markets

For CTOs, heads of trading, and digital asset leads, the integration's most important impact is not purely technical—it's organizational.

As Pavel Berngoltz, co‑founder and CTO of Fireblocks, notes, Lava's Smart Router "has enhanced our ability to provide optimal, reliable blockchain access for our users. It allows teams to focus more on innovation and less on managing node-level infrastructure."

This is a subtle but profound shift:

• Instead of allocating engineering talent to monitoring nodes and reacting to outages, teams can focus on product, liquidity, and new revenue lines.
• Instead of designing around the limitations of a single provider, they orchestrate across a modular, multi‑provider backbone.

In other words, blockchain infrastructure stops being a bottleneck and becomes a strategic enabler. For organizations implementing similar infrastructure automation strategies, comprehensive workflow automation frameworks can help teams systematically design and deploy resilient systems.

The strategic signal: reliability as competitive edge

Yair Cleper (also referred to as Yair Kalfer in some sources), founder of Magma Devs and an architect of Lava Network's infrastructure, frames this as the realization of a long-term vision: organizations like Fireblocks need performance, reliability, and accessibility at institutional scale—and that is exactly what Smart Router was designed to deliver.

For business leaders, a few strategic concepts are worth pausing on:

1. Reliability is product, not plumbing
   In institutional digital asset markets, blockchain reliability is no longer a background IT concern; it is part of your customer value proposition. If your settlement rails or trading interfaces falter when cloud services do, counterparties will move to platforms architected for resilience.

2. Multi-chain by design, not by accumulation
   Supporting "many chains" is easy to claim but hard to operationalize. True multi-chain data access requires unified routing, monitoring, and failover across diverse blockchain networks, not just a list of supported chains.

3. Abstraction is the new infrastructure moat
   By abstracting away individual data providers through Smart Router, Fireblocks builds an infrastructure layer that is harder to replicate and easier to extend—whether for new digital assets, tokenization, or future payment and settlement rails.

4. Cloud independence as risk mitigation
   The 2025 outages at Google Cloud, AWS, and Cloudflare turned "multi‑cloud" from a buzzword into a board‑level risk topic. Architectures that rely on redundant, vendor‑agnostic RPC layers—rather than a single cloud—will increasingly be viewed as prudential infrastructure, not optional redundancy.

For comprehensive analysis of cloud infrastructure risks and mitigation strategies, advanced analytics frameworks can help organizations assess and optimize their infrastructure resilience.

Questions for leaders building on blockchain

If you are steering a digital asset strategy, this partnership surfaces a series of questions worth taking back to your team:

• How many independent paths do you have today to reach the chains that matter most to your business?
• Can your RPC layer withstand a major cloud services disruption without visible service interruptions to clients?
• Do you have analytics and monitoring that give you real-time insight into infrastructure performance across chains and providers?
• How much of your engineering roadmap is consumed by maintaining connectivity versus building new products and markets?

The Lava Network–Fireblocks collaboration is a tangible example of how to answer those questions differently: by elevating reliability to a design principle, using intelligent routing like Smart Router, and treating high-availability access to blockchain data as the foundation for scalable, institutional‑grade onchain finance.

In the next wave of digital asset competition, the winners may not be the firms with the most chains or the flashiest front end—but the ones whose users never have to think about what's happening between a "send" click and a confirmed transaction. For organizations seeking to implement similar workflow automation and integration capabilities, Zoho Flow offers powerful integration platforms that can help streamline complex multi-provider orchestration and monitoring processes.

What problem does the Lava Network–Fireblocks integration solve?

It eliminates single‑provider RPC dependency by placing Lava Network's Smart Router as an intelligent, vendor‑agnostic control plane in front of multiple RPC/data providers. That gives institutional platforms like Fireblocks redundant, automatically routed paths to blockchain data to avoid outages, reduce latency, and maintain high availability across 100+ chains. For organizations seeking to implement similar resilient infrastructure strategies, comprehensive security and compliance frameworks provide essential guidance for enterprise-grade system design.

Why is RPC infrastructure critical for institutional digital asset platforms?

RPC is the middleware that powers transaction submission, wallet history queries, real‑time execution for trading, and cross‑chain flows. If RPC fails or becomes slow, trading, settlement and customer experiences degrade immediately—translating into lost volume, reputation risk, and regulatory exposure for institutions.

How does Lava's Smart Router improve resilience and performance?

Smart Router aggregates multiple RPC providers and automatically routes each request to the fastest, most reliable source. It includes built‑in failover, error recovery, dual caching to accelerate responses, and analytics/monitoring for provider visibility—so transient or provider‑level failures don't cascade into user‑visible outages. For sophisticated monitoring and automation of such complex systems, Make.com provides powerful no-code automation platforms that can help teams orchestrate failover processes and monitor system health across multiple providers.

Will integrating Smart Router require replacing my existing infrastructure?

No. One of the design goals is non‑disruptive integration: Smart Router sits on top of your current stack as a control plane, preserving existing nodes, providers and operational workflows while adding redundancy and intelligent routing.

Can Smart Router protect against major cloud provider outages (e.g., Google Cloud, AWS)?

Yes—by aggregating independent RPC providers and routing requests across different infrastructures and networks, Smart Router reduces reliance on any single cloud or provider. That multi‑provider approach mitigates the impact of cloud outages on blockchain data access and service continuity. For comprehensive analysis of cloud infrastructure risks and mitigation strategies, advanced analytics frameworks can help organizations assess and optimize their infrastructure resilience.

How much uptime improvement can institutions expect?

While no system can guarantee absolute 100% uptime, Smart Router is engineered to push toward near‑100% availability for blockchain data access through failover, caching and diverse provider paths. Actual gains depend on provider SLAs, implementation quality and operational practices.

Does Smart Router add latency by adding another layer?

No—Smart Router is optimized for performance. It uses provider performance metrics to route to the fastest source and employs dual caching to accelerate responses. In practice it often reduces latency compared with a single, overloaded provider, especially under failure conditions.

How does Smart Router handle error recovery and transient failures?

Smart Router has built‑in error detection and automatic failover logic that reroutes requests when a provider shows errors or degraded performance. It also implements retry strategies and dual caching so transient issues don't cascade into client‑visible outages. For organizations implementing similar infrastructure automation strategies, comprehensive workflow automation frameworks can help teams systematically design and deploy resilient systems.

What observability and monitoring does the Smart Router provide?

Smart Router exposes analytics and monitoring across providers and chains—latency, error rates, failovers and usage patterns—so engineering and ops teams gain real‑time insight into infrastructure health and can quickly respond to anomalies or tune routing policies.

How does this change the operating model for engineering teams?

By abstracting node‑level responsibilities, the integration lets teams spend less time firefighting nodes and more on product, liquidity, and new features. It shifts effort from maintaining connectivity toward building market‑facing functionality and strategic capabilities.

Does multi‑chain support mean simply "many chains" or something more?

True multi‑chain support requires unified routing, monitoring and failover across heterogeneous networks—not just a checkbox list of supported chains. Smart Router operationalizes multi‑chain access by providing consistent, resilient paths and observability across 100+ networks.

Does using an aggregator like Lava create vendor lock‑in or reduce flexibility?

Smart Router is vendor‑agnostic and designed to orchestrate across multiple providers, which reduces single‑vendor lock‑in. Because it sits above existing infrastructure and supports multiple backends, it can increase operational flexibility and make future provider swaps easier.

What security and compliance considerations remain when adopting Smart Router?

Smart Router improves availability but you still need enterprise security controls: encrypted connections, strict access controls, audit logging, provider due diligence and compliance workflows. Institutional platforms should validate Smart Router integrations against their security and regulatory requirements before production rollout. For comprehensive security and compliance guidance, security program frameworks provide essential best practices for enterprise infrastructure implementations.

What questions should leaders ask before implementing a multi‑provider RPC layer?

Key questions: How many independent paths currently reach your critical chains? Can your RPC layer survive a major cloud provider outage? What observability do you have across providers? How much of your roadmap is consumed by connectivity maintenance? What are provider SLAs and failover behaviours? For structured evaluation of infrastructure decisions, IT risk assessment frameworks can help organizations systematically analyze and mitigate infrastructure risks.

Is this approach suitable only for large institutions, or can smaller teams benefit too?

While the design targets institutional scale, smaller teams building mission‑critical services or any application sensitive to downtime can benefit from multi‑provider routing, caching and observability. The non‑disruptive, vendor‑agnostic model makes it accessible across organization sizes. For organizations seeking to implement similar workflow automation and integration capabilities, Zoho Flow offers powerful integration platforms that can help streamline complex multi-provider orchestration and monitoring processes.